Can J Surg. 2023 Nov 28;66(6):E572-E579. doi: 10.1503/cjs.013822. Print 2023 Nov-Dec.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delivering trauma and surgical care to Northern Quebec presents unique challenges owing to the region's remoteness, extreme weather and limited transport; the expansion of telehealth could help address these difficulties. We aimed to evaluate current surgical, trauma and telemedicine capacity in Nunavik, Quebec.

METHODS: We used validated assessment tools, including the Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedures, Equipment and Supplies survey, the International Assessment of Capacity for Trauma index and the Maryland Health Care Commission Telemedicine Readiness tool to evaluate surgical, trauma and telemedicine capacity, respectively. We adapted these tools to the Northern Quebec context through discussions with local leadership. Data were collected in 2 regional hospitals - the Ungava Tulattavik Health Centre (UTHC) and the Inuulitsivik Health Centre (IHC) - and 12 Centres locaux de services communautaires (CLSCs; local community services centres) in 6 villages along the Hudson Bay coast and 6 villages along the Ungava Bay coast through iterative discussions with 4 chief nurses from each regional hospital and set of CLSCs; resources were confirmed through on-site evaluation by the respondents. We performed a descriptive analysis of the data.

RESULTS: Surgical capacity was highest in the IHC (6.76) and lowest in the Ungava Bay CLSCs (5.52). Personnel (0%-0%) and procedures (13%-33%) were the least available resources. Trauma capacity was highest in the IHC (7.25) and lowest in the Hudson Bay CLSCs (5.58). Although equipment (90%-100%) and supplies (100%-100%) were readily available, personnel (0%-0%) and procedures (25%-56%) were lacking. The UTHC was most prepared for telehealth (67.80%), and the Ungava Bay CLSCs achieved a lower score (51.13%). Underdeveloped telehealth criteria included funding, administrative support, quality improvement and physical spaces (all 33%-67%).

CONCLUSION: Acute care capacity in Nunavik appears heterogeneous, with readily available equipment and supplies, but a lack of personnel capable of performing lifesaving procedures. To address the need for telemedicine, future initiatives should focus on improving funding, administrative support, physical spaces and quality-improvement initiatives.

PMID:38016727 | DOI:10.1503/cjs.013822

Telemed J E Health. 2023 Nov 28. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0172. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: To properly combine osteoporosis treatment with dental treatment and to prevent medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJI), a system of communication between health providers can be smoothly made within a short time is required. With the recent increase in the possibility of telemedicine being introduced in Korea, it is expected that the introduction of teleconsultation between health providers treating osteoporosis will reduce the discomfort of patients and health providers and improve satisfaction. In this study, a survey was conducted on the knowledge and experience of MRONJ to find out the willingness of dentists treating osteoporosis patients for teleconsultation. Methods: An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted to investigate the intention for teleconsultation for MRONJ with a total of 516 dentists between September and October 2021. Results: Two-thirds of the respondents had experience of requesting consultation other dentists or doctors for the osteoporosis or MRONJ patients. They answered that the referral letter was the most used consultation request method and that it took a long time to get a reply. As for the intention of teleconsultation, 70% of the respondents answered that they were willing. The more experienced or the higher the educational level, the higher the intention for teleconsultation. Although the intention of dentists for teleconsultation was high, satisfaction with the cost of teleconsultation was low. Discussion: Although dentists' intention to use teleconsultation was high, satisfaction with the cost of medical care for teleconsultation was low, so it seems that this should be coordinated.

PMID:38016130 | DOI:10.1089/tmj.2023.0172

Telemed J E Health. 2023 Nov 28. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0425. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The use of online health resources and self-diagnosis intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic, often resulting in symptoms of cyberchondria. However, little is still known about this phenomenon's real scale and determinants. The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of cyberchondria among adult internet users in Poland. Furthermore, the study was focused on analyzing the determinants of cyberchondria, with special regard to health literacy (HL) and e-health literacy (eHL). Methods: The analysis was based on data from a computer-assisted web-based interviewing survey performed with a sample of 1,613 internet users. Uni- and multivariable linear regression models were developed for potential determinants of cyberchondria. Results: Younger respondents were more likely to have higher cyberchondria scores than older respondents. Men were more likely to have lower cyberchondria scores than women. Higher health anxiety was significantly associated with cyberchondria severity. In the multivariable regression model, the severity of cyberchondria was significantly higher among respondents with inadequate rather than sufficient HL (B = 6.24, p < 0.001). In turn, greater eHL was significantly correlated with more severe cyberchondria (B = 0.92, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study confirmed that HL may be perceived as a protecting factor against cyberchondria. Unexpectedly, higher eHL predicts more severe cyberchondria.

PMID:38016126 | DOI:10.1089/tmj.2023.0425

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 28;25:e48483. doi: 10.2196/48483.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The routine measurement of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical care using electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) is gaining momentum worldwide. However, a deep understanding of the mechanisms underpinning ePROM interventions that could inform their optimal design to improve health outcomes is needed.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the implicit mechanisms that underpin the effectiveness of ePROM interventions and develop program theories about how and when ePROM interventions improve health outcomes.

METHODS: A realist synthesis of the literature about ePROM interventions in cancer clinical care was performed. A conceptual framework of ePROM interventions was constructed to define the scope of the review and frame the initial program theories. Literature searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL, supplemented by citation tracking, were performed to identify relevant literature to develop, refine, and test program theories. Quality appraisal of relevant studies was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS: Overall, 61 studies were included in the realist synthesis: 15 (25%) mixed methods studies, 9 (15%) qualitative studies, 13 (21%) descriptive studies, 21 (34%) randomized controlled trials, and 3 (5%) quasi-experimental studies. In total, 3 initial program theories were developed regarding the salient components of ePROM interventions-remote self-reporting, real-time feedback to clinicians, and clinician-patient telecommunication. The refined theories posit that remote self-reporting enables patients to recognize and report symptoms accurately and empowers them to communicate these to clinicians, real-time feedback prompts clinicians to manage symptoms proactively, and clinician-patient telephone interactions and e-interactions between clinic encounters improve symptom management by reshaping how clinicians and patients communicate. However, the intervention may not achieve the intended benefit if ePROMs become a reminder to patients of their illness and are not meaningful to them and when real-time feedback to clinicians lacks relevance and increases the workload.

CONCLUSIONS: The key to improving health outcomes through ePROM interventions is enabling better symptom reporting and communication through remote symptom self-reporting, promoting proactive management of symptoms through real-time clinician feedback, and facilitating clinician-patient interactions. Patient engagement with self-reporting and clinician engagement in responding to feedback are vital and may reinforce each other in improving outcomes. Effective ePROM interventions might fundamentally alter how clinicians and patients interact between clinic encounters.

PMID:38015606 | DOI:10.2196/48483

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 28;12:e51792. doi: 10.2196/51792.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is one of the most prevalent medical conditions that arise during pregnancy, resulting in maternal and neonatal complications. Mobile health (mHealth) has emerged as an innovative intervention for delivering maternal and child health care services. The evidence on the effectiveness of mHealth interventions in improving the health outcomes of pregnant women with hypertensive disorders is lacking. Therefore, there is a need for evidence synthesis using systematic review methods to address this evidence gap.

OBJECTIVE: This review aims to determine the efficacy of mHealth interventions in improving maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with hypertensive disorders. The review will answer the following research questions: (1) What are the types of mHealth interventions used in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders? (2) Are the various mHealth interventions effective in improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes, health behaviors, and their knowledge of the disease? and (3) Are mHealth interventions effective in supporting health care providers to make health care decisions for pregnant women with hypertensive disorders?

METHODS: This review will include randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, and cohort studies focusing on mHealth interventions for pregnant women with hypertensive disorders. Studies reporting health care providers use of mHealth interventions in caring for pregnant women with hypertensive disorders will be included. The search strategy will be tailored to each database using database-specific search terms. The search will be conducted in PubMed-MEDLINE, ProQuest, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. Other literature sources, such as trial registries and bibliographies of relevant studies, will be additionally searched. Studies published in English from January 2000 to January 2023 will be included. A total of 2 review authors will independently perform the data extraction and the quality appraisal. For quality appraisal of randomized controlled trials, the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool will be used. The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-1) tool will be used for nonrandomized controlled trials, and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for cohort studies will be used. Any disagreements between the 2 reviewers will be resolved through discussion and a third reviewer if required. A meta-analysis will be performed based on the availability of the data.

RESULTS: As per the protocol, the study methodology was followed, and 2 independent reviewers conducted the search in 6 databases and clinical registries. Currently, the review is in the full-text screening stage. The review will publish the results in the first quarter of 2024.

CONCLUSIONS: The evidence synthesized from this systematic review will help guide future research, support health care decisions, and inform policy makers on the effectiveness of mHealth interventions in improving the maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with hypertensive disorders.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/51792.

PMID:38015596 | DOI:10.2196/51792

Interact J Med Res. 2023 Nov 28;12:e43572. doi: 10.2196/43572.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the COVID-19 pandemic, a visit restriction policy for patients has been implemented in medical institutions worldwide and visits are being made using alternative communication technologies. This shift has also required the use of platforms to prevent negative consequences of these restrictions.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to comprehensively explore nonface-to-face visits as an alternative during infection prevention and to synthesize the scientific evidence of their benefits and disadvantages.

METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted via the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science electronic databases; unpublished trials in the clinical trials register ClinicalTrials.gov; and Virginia Henderson International Nursing Library up to September 10, 2021. The search query was developed according to the guidelines of the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies and included keywords on the topics of telemedicine and visitation restrictions. The inclusion criteria were a nonface-to-face modality using telemedicine with family in a hospital setting, experimental and observational studies, and articles written in English. The exclusion criteria were inaccessible in full text, not related to patient or family involvement, mainly focused on the study protocol, or only discussing the pros and cons of telemedicine.

RESULTS: Overall, patients' families experienced emotional distress due to restrictions on face-to-face visits. Nonface-to-face virtual visits compensating for these restrictions had a positive effect on reducing the risk of infection to the patient and the family. This further encouraged psychological and physical recovery and decreased psychological distress. However, nonface-to-face virtual technology could not replace the existence of actual families, and technical problems with networks and devices are reported as limitations.

CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring the availability of technology and educating on the same in alignment with the characteristics of patients and their families, nonface-to-face virtual visits need to show more potential as an effective patient-centered treatment strategy based on more research and advanced practice.

PMID:38015595 | DOI:10.2196/43572

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 28;25:e50029. doi: 10.2196/50029.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As digital health services advance, digital health equity has become a significant concern. However, people with disability and older adults still face health management limitations, particularly in the COVID-19 pandemic. An essential area of investigation is proposing a patient-centered design strategy that uses patient-generated health data (PGHD) to facilitate optimal communication with caregivers and health care service providers.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to conceptualize, develop, and validate a digitally integrated health care service platform for people with disability, caregivers, and health care professionals, using Internet of Things devices and PGHD to contribute to improving digital health equity.

METHODS: The methodology consists of 5 stages. First, a collaborative review of the previous app, Daily Healthcare 1.0, was conducted with individuals with disabilities, caregivers, and health care professionals. Secondly, user needs were identified via personas, scenarios, and user interface sketches to shape a user-centered service design. The third stage created an enhanced app that integrated these specifications. In the fourth stage, heuristic evaluations by clinical and app experts paved the way for Daily Healthcare 2.0, now featuring Internet of Things device integration. Conclusively, in the fifth stage, an extensive 2-month usability evaluation was executed with user groups comprising individuals with disabilities using the app and their caregivers.

RESULTS: Among the participants, "disability welfare information and related institutional linkage" was the highest priority. Three of the 14 user interface sketches the participants created were related to "providing educational content." The 11 heuristic evaluation experts identified "focusing on a single task" as a crucial issue and advocated redesigning the home menu to simplify it and integrate detailed menus. Subsequently, the app Daily Healthcare 2.0 was developed, incorporating wearable devices for collecting PGHD and connecting individuals with disabilities, caregivers, and health care professionals. After the 2-month usability evaluation with 27 participants, all participants showed an increase in eHealth literacy, particularly those who used the caregiver app. Relatively older users demonstrated improved scores in health IT usability and smartphone self-efficacy. All users' satisfaction and willingness to recommend increased, although their willingness to pay decreased.

CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we underscore the significance of incorporating the distinct needs of individuals with disabilities, caregivers, and health care professionals from the design phase of a digital health care service, highlighting its potential to advance digital health equity. Our findings also elucidate the potential benefits of fostering partnerships between health consumers and providers, thereby attenuating the vulnerability of marginalized groups, even amid crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Emphasizing this imperative, we advocate for sustained endeavors to bolster the digital literacy of individuals with disabilities and champion collaborative cocreation, aiming to uphold the collective ethos of health and digital health equity.

PMID:38015589 | DOI:10.2196/50029

Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Nov 28;18(1):143. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01355-2.

ABSTRACT

In a cross-sectional study assessing the experiences of individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta accessing care during the COVID-19 pandemic, participants reported high rates of delays in accessing medical care and high utilization of telehealth. Considering the needs of individuals with complex medical conditions is important when improving access to care.

PURPOSE: Individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) often have complex care needs requiring that they see a variety of specialists. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 led to delays in medical care for many health conditions. The goal of this study was to describe the experiences of individuals with OI accessing medical care during this time.

METHODS: Responses to an electronic survey distributed via the OI Foundation mailing list were collected from August 2020 until February 2021. Participants were instructed to compare their experiences in the months since the start of the pandemic with their experiences prior to this date. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and were compared across demographic groups using logistic regression and chi-squared tests.

RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 110 participants. Most participants (72%) reported experiencing delays in accessing at least one care provider. The majority of participants reported less or similar amounts of bone pain (74.3%) and less or the same rate of fracture (88.6%) as before the start of the pandemic.

CONCLUSION: While most study participants experienced delays in care, they did not report an increase in symptoms associated with OI. They also frequently utilized telehealth as a tool to see their providers. Future research should focus on the impact of changes in telehealth legislation on patients' ability to access care. As methods for care delivery evolve, the needs of people with OI and other rare diseases should be considered and prioritized.

PMID:38015270 | DOI:10.1007/s11657-023-01355-2

BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 27;13(11):e075157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075157.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Over 40% of US adults meet criteria for obesity, a major risk factor for chronic disease. Obesity disproportionately impacts populations that have been historically marginalised (eg, low socioeconomic status, rural, some racial/ethnic minority groups). Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for weight management exist but reach less than 3% of eligible individuals. The aims of this pilot randomised controlled trial are to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of dissemination strategies designed to increase reach of EBIs for weight management.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a two-phase, Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial, conducted with 200 Medicaid patients. In phase 1, patients will be individually randomised to single text message (TM1) or multiple text messages (TM+). Phase 2 is based on treatment response. Patients who enrol in the EBI within 12 weeks of exposure to phase 1 (ie, responders) receive no further interventions. Patients in TM1 who do not enrol in the EBI within 12 weeks of exposure (ie, TM1 non-responders) will be randomised to either TM1-Continued (ie, no further TM) or TM1 & MAPS (ie, no further TM, up to 2 Motivation And Problem Solving (MAPS) navigation calls) over the next 12 weeks. Patients in TM+ who do not enrol in the EBI (ie, TM+ non-responders) will be randomised to either TM+Continued (ie, monthly text messages) or TM+ & MAPS (ie, monthly text messages, plus up to 2 MAPS calls) over the next 12 weeks. Descriptive statistics will be used to characterise feasibility (eg, proportion of patients eligible, contacted and enrolled in the trial) and acceptability (eg, participant opt-out, participant engagement with dissemination strategies, EBI reach (ie, the proportion of participants who enrol in EBI), adherence, effectiveness).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Study protocol was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (#00139694). Results will be disseminated through study partners and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov; NCT05666323.

PMID:38011967 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075157

Telemed J E Health. 2023 Nov 27. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0490. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Accessing electronic health record information through a patient portal is associated with numerous benefits to both health care providers and patients. However, patient portal utilization remains low. Little is known about the factors associated with patient portal utilization following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: In March 2022, we conducted a random digit dial phone survey of both cell phones and landlines of adults living in Arkansas that asked numerous demographic and health-related measures, including patient portal utilization in the past 12 months. A total of 2,201 adult Arkansans completed the survey between March 1 and March 28, 2022. Weighted estimates were generated using rank ratio estimation to approximate the 2019 American Community Survey 1-year Arkansas estimates for race/ethnicity (72% White, 15% Black/African American, 7.8% Hispanic, 4.9% other race/ethnicity), age (73% 18-39, 32% 40-59, and 31% 60+), and gender (49% male, 51% female). We fit the data to a logistic regression model. Results: We found that education, employment, prior telehealth experience, having a check-up in the past 2 years, and having a primary care provider were all positively associated with patient portal utilization. We also found that non-Hispanic Black/African-American respondents were less likely to access a patient portal relative to non-Hispanic White respondents. Discussion: Patient portal utilization is related to several demographic and health-related factors among an adult population in Arkansas. Given that the documented benefits of patient portal utilization are broad, under-utilization by groups that already experience relatively worse health outcomes could reproduce or even exacerbate existing health disparities. Additional research is needed to further investigate what barriers to patient portal utilization remain for these populations.

PMID:38011711 | DOI:10.1089/tmj.2023.0490