BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12251-5.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospital at home (HaH) care models have gained significant attention due to their potential to reduce healthcare costs, improve patient satisfaction, and lower readmission rates. However, the lack of a standardized classification system has hindered systematic evaluation and comparison of these models. Taxonomies serve as classification systems that simplify complexity and enhance understanding within a specific domain.

OBJECTIVE: This paper introduces a comprehensive taxonomy of HaH care models, aiming to categorize and compare the various ways HaH services are delivered as an alternative to traditional hospital care.

METHODS: We developed a taxonomy of characteristics for HaH care models based on scientific literature and by applying a taxonomy development framework. To validate the taxonomy, and to analyze the current landscape of HaH models we matched the taxonomy to HaH care models described in literature. Finally, to identify types of HaH care implementations, we applied the k-means clustering method to care models represented using the taxonomy.

RESULTS: Our taxonomy consists of 12 unique dimensions structured into 5 perspectives following the progression from triaging, through care delivery, operational processes, and metrics for success: Persons and roles (2 dimensions), Target population (1 dimension), Service delivery and care model (6 dimensions), outcomes and quality metrics (2 dimensions), and training and education (1 dimension). Cluster analysis of 34 HaH care models revealed three distinct types: One cluster (50%, 17/34) focuses on patient eligibility and home environment suitability, a care model to be chosen for clinically complex patients. A second cluster (29.4%, 10/34) aggregates technology-enabled models using telemedicine and remote monitoring that are adaptable across settings. This type could be chosen for generalizable care. The third cluster (20.6%, 7/34) includes complex interventions involving informal caregivers and advanced medical devices, requiring caregiver training, supportive policies, and user-friendly technology to reduce caregiver burden and improve safety.

CONCLUSIONS: The clusters identified highlight practical considerations for adapting HaH care approaches to patient and contextual needs. These findings can guide policymakers in developing guidelines and assist practitioners in tailoring HaH care models to specific patient populations. The challenges encountered in collecting information on different characteristics of the taxonomy underscore the urgent need for more comprehensive and standardized reporting in scientific papers on HaH interventions.

PMID:39815296 | DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12251-5

JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jan 13;11:e56718. doi: 10.2196/56718.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Exercise can attenuate the deleterious combined effects of cancer treatment and aging among older adults with cancer, yet exercise participation is low. Telehealth exercise may improve exercise engagement by decreasing time and transportation barriers; however, the utility of telehealth exercise among older adults with cancer is not well established.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of a one-on-one, supervised telehealth exercise program on physical function, muscular endurance, balance, and flexibility among older adults with cancer.

METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed electronic health record data collected from the Personal Optimism With Exercise Recovery clinical exercise program delivered via telehealth among older adults with cancer (≥65 y) who completed a virtual initial program telehealth assessment between March 2020 and December 2021. The virtual initial assessment included the following measures: 30-second chair stand test, 30-second maximum push-up test, 2-minute standing march, single leg stance, plank, chair sit and reach, shoulder range of motion, and the clock test. All baseline measures were repeated after 12-weeks of telehealth exercise. Change scores were calculated for all assessments and compared to minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values for assessments with published MCIDs. Paired samples t tests (2-tailed) were conducted to determine change in assessment outcomes.

RESULTS: Older adults with cancer who chose to participate in the telehealth exercise program (N=68) were 71.8 (SD 5.3) years of age on average (range 65-92 y). The 3 most common cancer types in this sample were breast (n=13), prostate (n=13), and multiple myeloma (n=8). All cancer stages were represented in this sample with stage II (n=16, 23.5%) and III (n=18, 26.5%) being the most common. A follow-up telehealth assessment was completed by 29.4% (n=20) of older adults with cancer. Among those who completed a follow-up telehealth assessment, there were significant increases in the 30-second chair stand (n=19; mean change +2.00 repetitions, 95% CI 0.12 to 3.88) and 30-second maximum push-up scores (n=20; mean change +2.85 repetitions, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.11). There were no significant differences for the 2-minute standing march, plank, single leg stance, sit and reach, shoulder mobility, or clock test (P>.05). Nine (47.3%) older adults with cancer had a change in 30-second chair stand scores greater than the MCID of 2 repetitions.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a one-on-one, supervised telehealth exercise program may positively influence measures of physical function, muscular endurance, balance, and flexibility among older adults with cancer, but more adequately powered trials are needed to confirm these findings.

PMID:39814703 | DOI:10.2196/56718

Pain Manag Nurs. 2025 Jan 14:S1524-9042(24)00320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.007. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the tendency of older adults to present to the emergency department with pain complaints during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the prepandemic period.

METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective study design was used. Data were collected from the electronic medical records of older people who presented to emergency departments with pain before (March 2019-March 2020) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020-July 2021). We identified 10 pain diagnosis groups using ICD-10 codes. Patient data were grouped and cleaned using SQL scripts on the Oracle database.

RESULTS: It was determined that 13.3% of 405,404 older people had presented to the emergency department with pain between March 2019 and July 2021. There was a 14.2% decrease in such admissions during the pandemic period. In the study, an increase was observed in the rates of older adults presenting to the emergency department with myalgia and joint pain. In contrast, the rates of those presenting with low back and neck pain, headache, eye pain, dysuria, and acute pain decreased during the pandemic. In the regression analysis, predictors for older adults' presentation to the emergency department with pain included age over 85 years (OR: 1.403), female gender (OR: 1.053), and myalgia (OR: 2.471).

CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, our study revealed fewer presentations to the emergency department for pain-related complaints. To prevent severe health problems from delayed care, we recommend expanding telemedicine, remote pain management, and home-based care. Further research is needed to examine the long-term effects of increased myalgia and joint pain.

PMID:39814623 | DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.007

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 15;14:e57423. doi: 10.2196/57423.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Wheelchair users live predominantly sedentary lifestyles and have a substantially higher risk for cardiometabolic disease and mortality compared to people without disabilities. Exercise training has been found to be effective in improving cardiometabolic health (CMH) outcomes among people without disabilities, but research on wheelchair users is limited and of poor quality.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study is to examine the immediate and sustained effects of a 24-week, telehealth, movement-to-music cardiovascular (M2M-C) exercise program on core indicators of CMH among adult wheelchair users compared to an active control group. The secondary aim is to explore the beneficial effects of M2M-C exercises on cardiovascular capacity, physical activity, and quality of life. Intervention components include tailored exercises and remote performance monitoring, delivered via live videoconference training by a telecoach and asynchronous videos.

METHODS: This study's design is a parallel-arm randomized controlled trial enrolling 132 physically inactive adult wheelchair users with poor cardiometabolic profiles. The M2M-C intervention group involves 24 weeks of virtual live and monitored home exercise training (3×/wk, 15-40 min/session), followed by a 12-week maintenance period where participants have access to an online media library of exercise videos. The control group involves 36 weeks of self-guided exercise through access to a media library of exercise videos, including videos for range of motion, muscle strength, and balance. The primary outcomes are cardiometabolic indicators of health, and assessors are blinded.

RESULTS: Recruitment procedures started in January 2024 with the first participant enrolled on March 18, 2024. All data are anticipated to be collected by November 2027, and the main results of the trial are anticipated to be published by February 2028. Secondary analyses of data will be subsequently published. A total of 16 participants have been recruited as of paper submission.

CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge obtained from this trial will provide evidence to inform exercise prescriptions aimed at improving CMH among adult wheelchair users.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05606432; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05606432.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/57423.

PMID:39814364 | DOI:10.2196/57423

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12124-3.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This mixed methods study identified needed refinements to a telehealth-delivered cultural and linguistic adaptation of Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Chinese patients with advanced cancer (MCP-Ch) to enhance acceptability, comprehensibility, and implementation of the intervention in usual care settings, guided by the Ecological Validity Model (EVM) and the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM).

METHODS: Fifteen purposively sampled mental health professionals who work with Chinese cancer patients completed surveys providing Likert-scale ratings on acceptability and comprehensibility of MCP-Ch content (guided by the EVM) and pre-implementation factors (guided by PRISM), followed by semi-structured interviews. Survey data were descriptively summarized and linked to qualitative interview data. Three analysts independently coded the transcripts according to EVM and PRISM domains; discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus.

RESULTS: Quantitative findings showed high appropriateness and relevance of MCP-Ch across five EVM domains of Language, Metaphors/Stories, Goals, Content, and Concepts. Qualitative analysis yielded 23 inductive codes under the seven EVM domains: (1) Language (3 subcodes), (2) Persons (2 subcodes), (3) Metaphors/Stories (2 subcodes), (4) Methods (8 subcodes), (5) Content (2 subcodes), (6) Goals (4 subcodes), and (7) Concepts (2 subcodes). Themes based on PRISM included (1) Intervention characteristics (organizational perspective, 7 subcodes; and patient perspective, 6 subcodes) (2) External environment (2 subcodes), (3) Implementation and sustainability infrastructure (4 subcodes), and (4) Recipients (organizational characteristics, 5 subcodes; and patient characteristics, 4 subcodes).

CONCLUSION: Recommendations for next steps include increasing the MCP-Ch protocol's flexibility and adaptability to allow interventionists to flexibly tailor MCP-Ch material to meet patients' individual needs, simplifying content to improve comprehension and acceptability, providing additional training to Chinese-serving providers to increase adoption and sustainability, and considering interpreter-assisted delivery to increase access. Findings yielded important information to maximize cultural relevance as well as the implementation and sustainability potential of MCP-Ch in real-world settings.

PMID:39815347 | DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-12124-3

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 15;9:e63941. doi: 10.2196/63941.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mobile health apps have shown promising results in improving self-management of several chronic diseases in patients. We have developed a mobile health app (Cardiomeds) dedicated to patients with heart failure (HF). This app includes an interactive medication list; daily self-monitoring of symptoms, weight, blood pressure, and heart rate; and educational information on HF delivered through various formats.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a mixed methods usability study of Cardiomeds.

METHODS: Smartphone users with HF were recruited from the HF outpatient clinic at the University Hospital of Geneva. The usability test was conducted in 2 stages, with modifications made to the app after the first stage to address major usability issues. Each stage required 10 participants to perform 14 tasks, such as entering vital signs, entering a new medication and time of intake, or finding information about HF. Each task was timed, sessions were recorded, and all data were anonymized. After completing the tasks, patients completed the System Usability Scale 10-item questionnaire and answered 5 open questions about their perceptions of Cardiomeds.

RESULTS: Twenty patients with HF, 75% (15/20) of whom were men, with a mean age of 55 years, were included in this study. The average time to complete all 14 tasks was 18 (SD 5.7) minutes. Manual medication entry was the most time-consuming task, taking an average of 154.40 (SD 68.08) seconds in the first stage, 103.10 (SD 42.76) seconds in the second stage, and 128 (SD 63) seconds overall. The mean overall success rate was 77% (SD 0.23%) for the first stage and 94% (SD 0.07%) for the second stage. A total of 30% (3/10) of participants in the first stage completed all tasks without any help compared with 50% (5/10) of participants during the second stage. The average System Usability Scale score was 80% (SD 17%), showing a slight increase from 79% (SD 16%) in the first stage to 80% (SD 28%) in the second stage, which qualifies the app as "good" in terms of usability. Between the 2 stages, part of the app interface was redesigned to address the key issues identified in the first stage. Despite these improvements, problems related to guidance were frequent and comprised 36% (8/22) of the problems in the first stage and 40% (6/15) in the second stage. In response to open questions, 85% (17/20) of the participants responded that they would like to use the app when it became available.

CONCLUSIONS: The usability test indicated that Cardiomeds is a suitable and user-friendly app for patients with HF. The app will be further tested in a randomized clinical trial (2022-00731) after acute HF hospitalization to assess its impact on patients' knowledge about HF, self-care, and quality of life.

PMID:39813081 | DOI:10.2196/63941

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jan 15;27(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02171-x.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Significant inequities persist in hypertension detection and control, with minoritized populations disproportionately experiencing organ damage and premature death due to uncontrolled hypertension. Remote blood pressure monitoring combined with telehealth visits (RBPM) is proving to be an effective strategy for controlling hypertension. Yet there are challenges related to technology adoption, patient engagement and social determinants of health (SDoH), contributing to disparities in patient outcomes. This review summarizes the evidence to date for RBPM, focusing on the potential to advance health equity in blood pressure control and the existing levers for largescale implementation.

RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies demonstrate the promise of RBPM programs to address health disparities through: (1) the use of cellular-enabled blood pressure machines that do not require internet access or smart devices to connect readings into the medical record; (2) emphasis on home blood pressure monitoring to illuminate the daily factors that influence blood pressure control, thereby increasing patient empowerment; (3) adoption of standardized algorithms for hypertension management; and (4) integration of services to address SDoH. Multidisciplinary, non-physician care teams that include nurses, pharmacists, and community health workers are integral to this model. However, most studies have not embraced all aspects of RBPM, and implementation is challenging as current payment models do not support the digital components of RBPM or a diverse workforce of hypertension providers.

CONCLUSION: To address hypertension disparities, RBPM programs need to integrate digital technology that is accessible to all users as well as multidisciplinary care teams that attend to the medical and social needs of populations experiencing health inequities.

PMID:39812880 | DOI:10.1007/s11886-024-02171-x

Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Jan 15;317(1):247. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03732-4.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:39812823 | DOI:10.1007/s00403-024-03732-4

J Neurol. 2025 Jan 15;272(2):107. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12857-5.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neurological disorders pose a substantial burden worldwide in healthcare and health research. eHealth has emerged as a promising field given its potential to aid research, with lower resources. With a changing eHealth landscape, identifying available tools is instrumental for informing future research. A systematic review aimed to map existing software and hardware eHealth assessing neurological signs and/or symptoms for research was conducted. In this second part, the results on hardware are presented.

METHODS: We searched for relevant literature using four search engines (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, & EBSCOHost). eHealth software tools have been described elsewhere, and this paper reports hardware tools only. Data extraction focused on collecting the main characteristics of each tool, including the device type and size, the tool setup, and the neurological components assessed. The data were then summarised in tables.

FINDINGS: This review captured and described 45 relevant hardware tools. They assessed signs and/or symptoms of five neurological domains: cognitive function, cranial nerves, motor function, posture, gait & coordination, and sensation. Heterogeneity among tool types and setups was high, with most tools assessing posture, gait, & coordination. Over time, there has been an increase in the simplification and versatility of tools, with a preference for commercially available and easily accessible hardware.

INTERPRETATION: There is already a considerable number of hardware eHealth assessing neurological function that can be used for research purposes. Furthermore, commercially available tools, such as sensors, appear to be preferred due to their reduced costs, easy setup, and high portability. This opens new opportunities to extend neuroepidemiological research cost-effectively, efficiently, and adaptively.

PMID:39812676 | DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12857-5

BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1):zrae144. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae144.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The longitudinal effects of educational interventions in people with abdominal aortic aneurysm are largely unexplored. This prospective study investigated whether the anxiety-lowering effect of an eHealth intervention observed at the 1-month follow-up is maintained 1 year after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

METHODS: Those scheduled for surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm were recruited in a single-centre randomized clinical trial. The control group received care and follow-up per the institution's standard. The intervention group received an eHealth tool along with psychosocial support. The 1-month results have been reported. The primary outcome measure was the anxiety mean score (HADS-A).

RESULTS: Of 120 included participants, 96 completed the 1-year follow-up (48 in each treatment group). The mean age was 73 years, a majority (86%) were male and 73% were current or previous smokers. Anxiety symptoms measured with the HADS-A decreased over time in both the intervention group (-0.33) and the control group (-0.35, P = 0.868). The improvements in anxiety symptoms seen in the short-term follow-up were not sustained at the 1-year follow-up. No significant mean score differences were found in the intention-to-treat or per-protocol analyses.

CONCLUSION: In this randomized clinical trial, an eHealth intervention did not result in a sustained reduction in anxiety symptoms compared with standard care in the same cohort. The study provides an insight into the limited acceptability of an eHealth tool in people with abdominal aortic aneurysm and valuable data on the recovery trajectory following open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Further research is warranted to evaluate the relevance and long-term effectiveness of eHealth interventions in abdominal aortic aneurysm care.

REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03157973 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

PMID:39812416 | DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae144